The template is the secret nobody uses.
Every university review board publishes exactly what it wants: a protocol template, required sections, preferred wording for risk and consent. Most students write their study first and squeeze it into the form afterward, which is how a sound project earns three rounds of revisions. We work in the opposite order, drafting the protocol inside your board's template from the first sentence, with the risk language, data handling and recruitment plans phrased the way boards approve them.
The supporting stack gets built in the same pass: consent forms, recruitment scripts, survey instruments, interview guides and the ethics appendices your submission portal demands. A protocol that arrives complete reads as competent before anyone evaluates the science.
- ✓Full protocol drafted to your specific board's template and language
- ✓Consent forms, recruitment scripts and instruments prepared together
- ✓Revision letters answered point by point, with tracked changes
- ✓CITI guidance and ethics appendices sorted before submission
The revision letter is the real exam.
When the letter arrives with fifteen numbered concerns, the response format decides your timeline. Boards want each point acknowledged, addressed and cross-referenced to the revised text; anything looser restarts the clock. Our responses are written by researchers who have sat on review boards, including a former university IRB member, so the reply reads like it came from a colleague rather than a defendant.
That insider view is also why first-round outcomes are the design goal here. The fastest revision cycle is the one that never starts.
Who needs this service.
Doctoral candidates mostly: DNP projects, PhD dissertations and EdD studies that cannot collect a single data point until the board says yes. Master's students with thesis requirements and faculty-supervised projects come through as well. If your program has a review board standing between you and your data, the service applies, whatever the school.
Scope, honesty and the guarantee.
The quote states what we draft, what you review and when it submits. Ethics work has a hard edge: the study design is yours, the responses are truthful, and we decline work that asks otherwise. If our timeline slips, you know early, and late delivery on our side is refunded for the affected portion under our terms, the same policy that covers every service on the menu.
How it works.
Send the study
Your topic, program, board and any feedback already received. A researcher quotes it free within two hours.
The packet gets built
Protocol to template, consent documents, instruments and appendices drafted for your review.
Approval, then data
Submission goes in complete; if the board writes back, every point gets answered until the letter says approved.
Questions students actually ask.
Can you write my entire IRB protocol?
We draft the full protocol to your board's template, built around the study design you own: purpose, methods, risk mitigation, data handling, recruitment and consent language. You review and approve every section before submission, because you will defend this document. The drafting muscle is ours; the study remains genuinely yours.
My IRB sent revisions. Can you handle just the response?
Yes, response-only engagements are routine. Each numbered concern gets a direct answer cross-referenced to the revised protocol text, prepared in the format boards expect, usually within days. Half of the applications we rescue arrive exactly here: sound study, weak paperwork, third revision round looming and a defense date at risk.
Do you help with CITI training requirements?
We provide guidance on which CITI modules your submission requires and how the certificates attach to your application, alongside the ethics appendices most portals demand. The training itself is completed by you, since certification is personal, but nobody wastes a submission cycle on a missing module again.
Which schools' review boards do you know?
The service is board-agnostic by design: any program with a review board, at any university. The method holds everywhere because it starts from your specific board's published template and guidance. Boards known for thorough review simply get more conservative risk language and tighter documentation from the first draft.
How much does IRB support cost?
Quoted by scope after a free review that comes back within two hours: full packet drafting prices differently from a revision-letter response or a consent-form cleanup. State what stage you are at and the quote covers exactly that stage, with the option to extend if the board asks for more.
